|
When Same-Sex Marriage Was a Christian Rite
A Kiev art museum contains a curious icon from St. Catherine's Monastery on Mt. Sinai in Israel. It shows two robed Christian saints. Between them is a traditional Roman ‘pronubus’ (a best man), overseeing a wedding. The pronubus is Christ. The married couple are both men. Is the icon suggesting that a gay "wedding" is being sanctified by Christ himself? The idea seems shocking. But the full answer comes from other early Christian sources about the two men featured in the icon, St. Sergius and St. Bacchus, two Roman soldiers who were Christian martyrs. These two officers in the Roman army incurred the anger of Emperor Maximian when they were exposed as ‘secret Christians’ by refusing to enter a pagan temple. Both were sent to Syria circa 303 CE where Bacchus is thought to have died while being flogged. Sergius survived torture but was later beheaded. Legend says that Bacchus appeared to the dying Sergius as an angel, telling him to be brave because they would soon be reunited in heaven. While the pairing of saints, particularly in the early Christian church, was not unusual, the association of these two men was regarded as particularly intimate. Severus, the Patriarch of Antioch (AD 512 - 518) explained that, "we should not separate in speech they [Sergius and Bacchus] who were joined in life". This is not a case of simple "adelphopoiia." In the definitive 10th century account of their lives, St. Sergius is openly celebrated as the "sweet companion and lover" of St. Bacchus. Sergius and Bacchus's close relationship has led many modern scholars to believe they were lovers. But the most compelling evidence for this view is that the oldest text of their martyrology, written in New Testament Greek describes them as "erastai,” or "lovers". In other words, they were a male homosexual couple. Their orientation and relationship was not only acknowledged, but it was fully accepted and celebrated by the early Christian church, which was far more tolerant than it is today. Contrary to myth, Christianity's concept of marriage has not been set in stone since the days of Christ, but has constantly evolved as a concept and ritual. Prof. John Boswell, the late Chairman of Yale University’s history department, discovered that in addition to heterosexual marriage ceremonies in ancient Christian church liturgical documents, there were also ceremonies called the "Office of Same-Sex Union" (10th and 11th century), and the "Order for Uniting Two Men" (11th and 12th century). These church rites had all the symbols of a heterosexual marriage: the whole community gathered in a church, a blessing of the couple before the altar was conducted with their right hands joined, holy vows were exchanged, a priest officiatied in the taking of the Eucharist and a wedding feast for the guests was celebrated afterwards. These elements all appear in contemporary illustrations of the holy union of the Byzantine Warrior-Emperor, Basil the First (867-886 CE) and his companion John. Such same gender Christian sanctified unions also took place in Ireland in the late 12thand/ early 13th century, as the chronicler Gerald of Wales (‘Geraldus Cambrensis’) recorded. Same-sex unions in pre-modern Europe list in great detail some same gender ceremonies found in ancient church liturgical documents. One Greek 13th century rite, "Order for Solemn Same-Sex Union", invoked St. Serge and St. Bacchus, and called on God to "vouchsafe unto these, Thy servants [N and N], the grace to love one another and to abide without hate and not be the cause of scandal all the days of their lives, with the help of the Holy Mother of God, and all Thy saints". The ceremony concludes: "And they shall kiss the Holy Gospel and each other, and it shall be concluded". Another 14th century Serbian Slavonic "Office of the Same Sex Union", uniting two men or two women, had the couple lay their right hands on the Gospel while having a crucifix placed in their left hands. After kissing the Gospel, the couple were then required to kiss each other, after which the priest, having raised up the Eucharist, would give them both communion. Records of Christian same sex unions have been discovered in such diverse archives as those in the Vatican, in St. Petersburg, in Paris, in Istanbul and in the Sinai, covering a thousand-years from the 8th to the 18th century. The Dominican missionary and Prior, Jacques Goar (1601-1653), includes such ceremonies in a printed collection of Greek Orthodox prayer books, “Euchologion Sive Rituale Graecorum Complectens Ritus Et Ordines Divinae Liturgiae” (Paris, 1667). While homosexuality was technically illegal from late Roman times, homophobic writings didn’t appear in Western Europe until the late 14th century. Even then, church-consecrated same sex unions continued to take place. At St. John Lateran in Rome (traditionally the Pope's parish church) in 1578, as many as thirteen same-gender couples were joined during a high Mass and with the cooperation of the Vatican clergy, "taking communion together, using the same nuptial Scripture, after which they slept and ate together" according to a contemporary report. Another woman to woman union is recorded in Dalmatia in the 18th century. Prof. Boswell's academic study is so well researched and documented that it poses fundamental questions for both modern church leaders and heterosexual Christians about their own modern attitudes towards homosexuality. For the Church to ignore the evidence in its own archives would be cowardly and deceptive. The evidence convincingly shows that what the modern church claims has always been its unchanging attitude towards homosexuality is, in fact, nothing of the sort. It proves that for the last two millennia, in parish churches and cathedrals throughout Christendom, from Ireland to Istanbul and even in the heart of Rome itself, homosexual relationships were accepted as valid expressions of a God-given love and committment to another person, a love that could be celebrated, honored and blessed, through the Eucharist in the name of, and in the presence of, Jesus Christ.
|
Change Location:
|
So, what is your point?
Are you saying that Same-sex marriage should NOT be allowed due to separation of church and state?
PS: You still confuse love with sex.
It's none of the state's business who loves who. 'Sarkikos' Christians like yourself suffer from an unhealthy voyeuristic obsession over other people's expressions of love.
The whole point of the article is that the primitive Christian church of the Patristic period was far more understanding and accepting of gay and lesbian love than are today's Christo-nazis. Same gender devotion was socially accepted or simply ignored. Many of today's theological non-issues, such as circumcision, female niddah, or men and women praying together in a House of Prayer were not; these were highly controversial issues to primitive Christian theology. Can you imagine, for example, a modern deacon baptizing and anointing with oil the totally nude bodies of adults of both genders, as was common up to the third or fourth century? In the Didascalia and The Apostolic Constitutions, deaconesses are to assist the male clergy in the baptism of women since "baptism required total nudity." Go; obsess on that for a while.
ThosPayne,
Thank you for your lucid article bringing to light the presence of homosexuality throughout the history of the Church. In today’s polarized culture, it can only do us good to see that the issues we face are rarely, if ever, new. Prof. Boswell’s research sounds fascinating and I look forward to becoming more acquainted with it.
I think we can all agree that for the Church to ignore or deny the existence of same sex attraction throughout the age would not only be foolish, but dishonest. As I am quite fond of Church history, I see how understanding our past is crucial to understanding our present, and this issue is no exception. Certainly, if it helps the current generation to better understand Christ’s mandate to be salt and light rather than vinegar and gall we will all be the better for it. The reputation of the Church within the homosexual community is largely deserved, and as a member of the Body of Christ, I apologize for the rash and shallow attitude of many immature and misguided saints.
That being said, I would like to point out that if we are to determine what is to be normative within Christianity by what the Church has sanctioned throughout history, then we are in big trouble. The Church has been run by men and women who have varied considerably in their commitment to actually practice the truths delivered to us in the Bible. When a logical, historical-grammatical interpretation of the text has been practiced, it has brought life and peace. When this approach has been overshadowed by what may seem right to us at any given time, history shows that we have suffered for it.
My point is this; Christ came to give us life. As we grope through the darkness searching for that elusive thing we all know exists yet seems to remain just out of reach, there are things we can stumble into that seem to be the answer, that seem to bring life, or at least a respite from the storm of life, but rather bring more heartache and pain over the long term. The obedience called for in the Bible is not for the purpose of wrecking the party, nor is it the capricious whim of a punitive God, but it is to protect us from seeking salvation in empty things. It is to guide us into those things that actually produce life. As someone who has had intimate experience with same-sex attraction and the gay community (as well as a litany of other short term solutions), I can state with authority that in the vast majority of cases, homosexuality leads to heartache, pain, sorrow and death. I write this for those who are experiencing this pain and would like a way out.
Christ’s offer of life is for any who would take it.
Thanks again for providing this forum for the exchange of experience and ideas. We are in dire need of platforms where we can get beyond the clash of worldviews, and openly explore the presuppositions behind them.
This article is quite imaginary and deceptive.
Do your own research before you accept this article as the complete truth.
The Icon may depict two brothers and or sisters. Just because someone paints an Icon it does NOT mean that it is blessed by Jesus. The term "love" and "Kiss" are used in a manipulative and deceptive manner.
Thank you for this article. We affirm our own humanity by acknowledging others. (Read "God Has A Dream" by Desmond Tutu)...My son was beaten and raped (by hetero men) at 16 because he was gay...A horrid hate crime...Always gentle, never into "destructive" play as a child, he chose music over sports (although a natural athlete). My son's IQ ranges in the 150's and holds 2 advanced degrees. He is spiritual, artistic, creative, & kind. Current research does not give a complete definitive answer as to when a child's sexual orientation is determined/formed. Many sources site that it occurs at conception and is fully developed by 18 months of age. How old were you when you found out you were left or right handed? Does that make a difference as to your character or worth? Our sexual orientation is as God-given as any other characteristics: skin color, size, shape, left/right dominance, abilities/disabilities...Love all; respect all; think of our common humanity -- our differences give us beautiful opportunities! My praise and thanks to those who will stand up to discrimination and bigotry...BTW:Isn't God is too big for one religion? one interpretation? Open hearts and open minds make for compassion.
johnpw:
You obviously didn't read the article. Historical documentation shows quite clearly that the two men depicted in the icon were Roman soldiers who were homosexual lovers and that they were married by the early Christian church. There's nothing deceptive or imaginary involved here (other than your cult's interpretation of The Bible).